Jordan v. Monsanto Company
Mark Jordan |
Monsanto Company |
3:2020cv00030 |
February 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Gina M Groh |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF ATTORNEY ADMISSION. Verification sent via cm/ecf to Ken Moll. (cwm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company, filed by Mark Jordan. Filing Fee $400.00 - Receipt #0424-2990774. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cwm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jordan v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Jordan | |
Represented By: | Ken Moll |
Represented By: | Stephen G. Skinner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.