Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Lisha M. Walker |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv00041 |
| March 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Michael John Aloi |
| Gina M Groh |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 2/23/2021. (cmd)
|
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion re #22 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reisenweber, Erin) |
| Filing 23 Memorandum in Support re #22 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Lisha M. Walker. (Miller, Travis) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Lisha M. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Assignment of EAJA Fee)(Miller, Travis) |
| Filing 21 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Lisha M. Walker against Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Clerk of Court on 11/19/2020. (cmd) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING #19 UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR REMAND. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 11/19/2020. (cmd)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to Remand by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reisenweber, Erin) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 10/19/2020. (cmd)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Responsive Brief by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reisenweber, Erin) |
| Filing 16 Memorandum in Support re #15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lisha M. Walker. (Miller, Travis) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Lisha M. Walker. (Miller, Travis) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF BRIEFS PURSUANT TO LR Civ P 9.02. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 08/18/2020. (cwm)
|
| Filing 12 Federal Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Reisenweber, Erin) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT re #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Lisha M. Walker. (Miller, Travis) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 6/17/2020. (tlg)
|
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reisenweber, Erin) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 5/19/2020. (cmd)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Podraza Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Reisenweber, Erin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin K. Reisenweber on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Reisenweber, Erin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security served on 3/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Atty Gen served on 3/23/2020, #2 NDWV Atty served on 3/19/2020)(cmd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING #2 PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND AFFIDAVIT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 3/11/2020. Copy to USM.(cmd)
|
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisha M. Walker. (cmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Lisha M. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(cmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
