Minor v. Bureau of Prisons et al
| Cordell Minor |
| Bureau of Prisons, Amy Armel, Dr. Emmanuel Adams and Department of Justice |
| 3:2020cv00062 |
| April 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Plaintiff. (tlg) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Release of Funds, styled "Motion to Order F.C.I. Hazelton Staff to Release Check or Money of Minor's Account to Pay Filing Fee," by Cordell Minor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Cordell Minor. (Attachments: #1 ledger sheets, #2 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Cordell Minor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cordell Minor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Emmanuel Adams, Amy Armel, Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, filed by Cordell Minor. (Attachments: #1 memorandum/addendum, #2 affidavit/declaration, #3 Exhibit A, medical records and greviances, #4 Envelope). Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and law clerk Sims.(tlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
