Davis v. Hoover et al
| Keenan A. Davis |
| Nurse Senko, P.A. Hoover, Lt. Abdul Aziz, C/O M. Liston and C/O C. Owens |
| 3:2020cv00136 |
| August 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 09/03/2020. (cwm) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 08/27/2020. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/27/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm).
|
| Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 08/05/2020. (cwm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachment: #1 Court-Approved Bivens Forms) Original notice and forms mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2020: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm). |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keenan A. Davis. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(cwm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Abdul Aziz, Hoover, M. Liston, C. Owens, Senko, filed by Keenan A. Davis. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Magistrate Judge Robert Trumble and PSLC B. Sims assigned. (cwm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
