Spence v. City of Martinsburg WV et al
| Winston L. Spence, Jr. |
| John Doe(s) 1-3, Chief Maury Richards, City of Martinsburg WV, Martinsburg Police Department and Patrolman N. Cook |
| 3:2020cv00163 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF REFERRAL. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 10/29/2020. (cwm) Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm).
|
| Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 09/23/2020. (cwm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Plaintiff. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/4/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg). |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Winston L. Spence, Jr. Pleading was hand-delivered. (tlg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Martinsburg WV, Patrolman N. Cook, John Doe(s) 1-3, Martinsburg Police Department, Chief Maury Richards, filed by Winston L. Spence, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). Pleading was hand-delivered.(tlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
