Bulger v. John/Jane Does 1-30
William M. Bulger |
John/Jane Does 1-30 |
3:2020cv00206 |
October 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Thomas S Kleeh |
Robert W Trumble |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Henry Brennan. Attorney Henry Brennan for William M. Bulger added. Signed by District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh on 11/18/2020. (cwm) |
Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee: $200.00 - receipt number WVNM001754 for attorney Henry Brennan. (cwm) |
Filing 3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Henry Brennan Other Document filed by William M. Bulger. (DiTrapano, Louis) Modified: to correct event to motion and regenerate NEF on 11/16/2020 (cwm). |
Filing 2 PAPERLESS ORDER: For reasons appearing to the Court, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transfer this case to the Docket of the Honorable Thomas S. Kleeh, District Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on November 2, 2020. (wlb) |
District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh added. Chief Judge Gina M. Groh no longer assigned to case. (cmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John/Jane Does 1-30, filed by William M. Bulger. Filing Fee $400.00 Receipt #0424-3146557. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment) Magistrate Judge Robert Trumble and PSLC B. Sims assigned. (cwm) Modified: to add fee information and regenerate NEF on 11/2/2020 (cwm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.