Shelton v. Hudgins et al
Petitioner: Ronnie Shelton
Respondent: Warden Hudgins, M.D. Mimms and DHO Kraddok
Case Number: 3:2021cv00134
Filed: August 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Gina M Groh
Referring Judge: Robert W Trumble
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 9/10/2021. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/10/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
August 26, 2021 Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/23/2021 per USPS website. (tlg)
August 24, 2021 Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNE016932 (tlg)
August 23, 2021 Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice (Other), #3 Notice (Other). SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/19/2021. (tlg)
August 18, 2021 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 8/18/2021. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/18/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
August 18, 2021 Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble no longer assigned to case per #4 order. (tlg)
August 16, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/16/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
August 16, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Form, IFP; #2 Court-Approved Form, prisoner trust account report). Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/16/2021: #3 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
August 16, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Hudgins, Kraddok, Mimms. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Case assigned to MJ Trumble and law clerk Sims.(tlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelton v. Hudgins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronnie Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Hudgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M.D. Mimms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DHO Kraddok
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?