Moser v. USA
| Connie Su Moser |
| USA |
| 3:2022cv00012 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 Order Dismissing Case. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 3/14/2022 per USPS website. (tlg) |
Filing 8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 3/11/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/11/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
|
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 Notice (Other). SERVICE ACCEPTED on 2/7/2022 per USPS website. (tlg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Forms.) Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg). |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00235. (tlg) |
|
Filing 4
Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Clarksberg Division Division of Northern District of West Virginia. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/1/2022) (mjr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2022.]
|
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mjr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2022.] |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2022.] |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Second Chance Reauthorization Act) filed by Connie Su Moser. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mjr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 2/1/2022.] Modified on 2/1/2022 to restrict per PSLC Sims (tlg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moser v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Connie Su Moser | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
