Blickenstaff v. Ames
Petitioner: Michael L. Blickenstaff
Respondent: Donald F. Ames
Case Number: 3:2022cv00069
Filed: April 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: Gina M Groh
2 Judge: James P Mazzone
3 Judge: Robert W Trumble
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 6/8/2022. (je) Copy mailed to pro se Petitioner and Office of the Attorney General by certified mail, return receipt requested. (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/8/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/8/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je).
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #2 IN FORMA PAUPERIS Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 6/8/2022. (je) Copy mailed to pro se Petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested. (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/8/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je).
May 24, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Beth Niday on behalf of Donald F. Ames (Niday, Mary)
April 29, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 4/25/2022. (je)
April 22, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 04/18/2022 per USPS website. (cwm)
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Signed by District Judge Gina M Groh on 4/20/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/20/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
April 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
April 14, 2022 Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael L. Blickenstaff. (Attachments: #1 ledger sheets, #2 Envelope).(tlg)
April 14, 2022 Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael L. Blickenstaff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg)
April 14, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Donald F. Ames, filed by Michael L. Blickenstaff. (Attachments: #1 memorandum decision, #2 Envelope). Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and PSLC Sims.(tlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blickenstaff v. Ames
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael L. Blickenstaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Donald F. Ames
Represented By: Karen C. Villanueva-Matkovich
Represented By: Mary Beth Niday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?