Myles v. Hong et al
Ronald R. Myles, Jr. |
Chaplain Y. Hong, D. Husk, C.O. D. Burkett, Watson, Counselor Kemper, Lt. Kinder, C.O. Loggings, C.O. Duffle, H. Berryman, C.O. Stiltner, C.O. Moss, J. Clark, C.O. Cantrell, C.O. Moreno, S. Clayton and Gilmer Federal Correctional Institution |
3:2022cv00108 |
June 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Gina M Groh |
Robert W Trumble |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Forms - Bivens packet). Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Plaintiff.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/21/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg). |
Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ronald R. Myles, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Ronald R. Myles, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald R. Myles, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against H. Berryman, D. Burkett, Cantrell, J. Clark, S. Clayton, Duffle, Gilmer Federal Correctional Institution, Y. Hong, D. Husk, Kemper, Kinder, Loggings, Moreno, Moss, Stiltner, Watson, filed by Ronald R. Myles, Jr. (Attachments: #1 order, #2 Envelope). Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and PSLC Sims.(tlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.