Klous v. Brown
Petitioner: Jessey Klous
Respondent: S. Brown
Case Number: 3:2022cv00152
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Gina M Groh
Referring Judge: Robert W Trumble
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2022 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Jessey Klous re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 Envelope). File-stamped copy of cover letter returned to Petitioner as requested.(tlg)
October 11, 2022 Filing 10 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, #9 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/7/2022 per USPS website. (tlg)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTIONS 3 FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 10/4/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/4/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION #2 TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION BUT DIRECTING PETITIONER TO REFILE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOCAL RULES OF PRISONER LITIGATION PROCEDURE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 10/4/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/4/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
October 3, 2022 Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNM002137 (tlg)
September 14, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Notice, #4 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/12/2022 per USPS website. (tlg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/6/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
September 6, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Forms). Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/6/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
September 6, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel as contained within #1 petition by Jessey Klous. (tlg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Jessey Klous. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg)
September 6, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against S. Brown, Acting Warden, filed by Jessey Klous. (Attachments: #1 supplement/addendum, #2 cover letter, #3 Envelope). File-stamped copy of petition sent as requested. Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and PSLC Sims.(tlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klous v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jessey Klous
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: S. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?