Saul v. Ames
Brandon S. Saul |
Donnie Ames |
3:2022cv00169 |
October 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Gina M Groh |
Robert W Trumble |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RETURN RECEIPT as to #12 Order to Show Cause. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/14/2022. (je) |
Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 11/8/2022. (je)Copy to pro se Petitioner by CMRR. Copy of order and petition w/exhibits to Office of the Attorney General c/o Villanueva-Matkovich. (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/8/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je). |
Filing 11 Habeas Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNM002160. (je) |
Filing 10 RETURN RECEIPT as to #9 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/25/2022. (je) |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION #2 TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING PETITIONER TO PAY THE $5.00 FILING FEE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 10/21/2022. Copy of order sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/21/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Brandon S. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(je) Same address on file. |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Brandon S. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B - Document re: Circuit Court case no 17-F-6, #2 Exhibit C - Letter re: Circuit Court case no 17-F-6, #3 Exhibit D - Document re: Circuit Court case no 17-F-6, #4 Envelope)(je) |
Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/11/2022. (je) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Beth Niday on behalf of Donnie Ames (Niday, Mary) |
Filing 4 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court. (je) Copy to pro se Petitioner by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/6/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je). |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon S. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Ledger sheets, #2 Envelope)(je) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon S. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(je) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Donnie Ames, Superintendent, filed by Brandon S. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Hardy County, West Virginia court filings, #2 Envelope)(je) Modified on 10/24/2022 Attachment #1 restricted due to violation of E-Govt Act by directive of Judge Groh/mm(je). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Saul v. Ames | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Brandon S. Saul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Donnie Ames | |
Represented By: | Karen C. Villanueva-Matkovich |
Represented By: | Mary Beth Niday |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.