Hensley v. Brown
Petitioner: Robert Nathan Hensley
Respondent: S. Brown
Case Number: 3:2022cv00178
Filed: October 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Gina M Groh
Referring Judge: Robert W Trumble
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/29/2022. (tlg)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION #10 FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 11/23/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
November 14, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION to Reconsider re: #6 ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION #2 TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION. by Robert Nathan Hensley. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(cwm)
October 31, 2022 Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/28/2022 per USPS website. (tlg)
October 28, 2022 Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Notice, #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/24/2022. (tlg)
October 28, 2022 Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNE018250 (tlg)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION #2 TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 10/21/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
October 20, 2022 Filing 5 LETTER from Deputy Clerk to Robert Hansley. (Copy via US mail) (jmm)
October 20, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/20/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
October 20, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Forms). Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/20/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
October 20, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Robert Nathan Hensley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg)
October 20, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against S. Brown, warden,, filed by Robert Nathan Hensley. (Attachments: #1 memorandum, #2 cover letter, #3 Envelope). File-stamped copy of motions returned to petitioner. Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and PSLC Sims.(tlg) Modified on 10/31/2022 - Page 12(c)(1) was missing from the original pleading (tlg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hensley v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Nathan Hensley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: S. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?