Cook v. Ames
| Ray Cook |
| Donald F. Ames |
| 3:2022cv00194 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Gina M Groh |
| James P Mazzone |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 RETURN RECEIPT as to #16 Order to Show Cause. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/17/2023. (tlg) |
| Filing 20 RETURN RECEIPT as to #19 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/17/2023. (tlg) |
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING MOTION #18 FOR EXTENSION of Time to Answer. Respondent shall have until 3/25/2023 to file a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 1/12/2023. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/12/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
|
| Filing 18 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Donald F. Ames. (Bissett, Lara) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Lara Kathleen Bissett on behalf of Donald F. Ames (Bissett, Lara) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Respondent is directed to file an answer or otherwise respond within 28 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 1/11/2023. Copy of petition #1 and order mailed to K. Villanueva-Matkovich; copy of order sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/11/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
|
| Filing 15 LETTER from Ray Cook to Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Copy of docket sheet sent.(tlg) |
| Filing 14 RETURN RECEIPT as to #12 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 12/27/2022. (tlg) |
| Filing 13 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNM002187 (tlg) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and finding as moot #10 Motion to Extend Filing Fee Deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 12/21/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/21/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
|
| Filing 11 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ray Cook. (Attachments: #1 ledger sheets, #2 notice of deficient pleading, #3 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Filing Fee Deadline, by Ray Cook. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 12/12/2022. (tlg) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/6/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
|
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Notice, #5 Notice. Per USPS: "Your package is moving within the USPS network and is on track to be delivered to its final destination. It is currently in transit to the next facility." (tlg) |
|
Filing 6
TRANSFER ORDER. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 12/1/2022. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/1/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Form - prisoner trust account report). Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Petitioner.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2022: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg). |
| Filing 3 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ray Cook. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Form - application and affidavit to proceed without prepayment of fees; #2 ledger sheets; #3 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Ray Cook. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Donald F. Ames, filed by Ray Cook. (Attachments: #1 question 9(e) grounds raised on direct appeal, #2 memorandum decision, #3 state court order, #4 memorandum decision, #5 Envelope). Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and PSLC Sims.(tlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cook v. Ames | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ray Cook | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Donald F. Ames | |
| Represented By: | Karen C. Villanueva-Matkovich |
| Represented By: | Lara Kathleen Bissett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
