Fernandez Caicedo-Ortiz v. Brown
| Carlos Fernandez Caicedo-Ortiz |
| Warden R. Brown |
| 3:2023cv00009 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE TO THE RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, filed by Carlos Fernandez Caicedo-Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Administrative remedies, #2 Envelope)(je) |
| Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 Order, Roseboro Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 3/3/2023. (je) |
Filing 11
ORDER AND ROSEBORO NOTICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 2/27/2023. (je)Copy to pro se Petitioner by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/27/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je).
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by R. Brown re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Spearen Declaration, #2 Spearen Declaration Exhibits)(Palmer, Jordan) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by R. Brown. (Palmer, Jordan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Vincent Palmer on behalf of R. Brown (Palmer, Jordan) |
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 Order to Show Cause. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 2/13/2023. (tlg) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 2/8/2023. (je)Copy to pro se Petitioner by CMRR. Copy to AUSA Prezioso by mail and NEF. (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/8/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je).
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNE018561. (je) |
| Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice, #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 1/23/2023 per USPS website. (je) |
| Filing 3 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court. (je)Copy to pro se Petitioner by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/19/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Form IFP and PTAR)(je)Copy mailed to pro se Petitioner by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/19/2023: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against R. Brown, filed by Carlos Fernandez Caicedo-Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - statements by petitioner, #2 Exhibit B - First Step Act Act (FSA) FAQS, #3 Exhibit C - Excerpt on Public Law, #4 Exhibit D - Request to Staff, #5 Envelope)(je) (Pages 11-12 not received w/Petition) Modified text on 1/19/2023 (je). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fernandez Caicedo-Ortiz v. Brown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Carlos Fernandez Caicedo-Ortiz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden R. Brown | |
| Represented By: | Christopher James Prezioso |
| Represented By: | Jordan Vincent Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
