Raifsnider v. Lovett, et al
| Larry Raifsnider |
| S. Lovett, US Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General and Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office |
| 3:2023cv00068 |
| March 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 3/23/2023. (je) |
Filing 5
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 3/20/2023. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Plaintiff.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/20/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
|
| Filing 4 EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL by Larry Raifsnider. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 3 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 3/13/2023 per USPS website. (tlg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Form Bivens packet)(je)Copy to pro se Plaintiff by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/10/2023: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cmd). |
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY PETITION FOR MOTION TO COMPEL OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE COMPASSIONATE RELEASE UNDER 18 USC 3582 against S. Lovett, Warden USP Hazelton, US Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General, Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office, filed by Larry Raifsnider. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(je) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
