Phillips v. Peters et al
Plaintiff: Andrew C Phillips
Defendant: Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Case Number: 3:2023cv00149
Filed: June 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Gina M Groh
Referring Judge: Robert W Trumble
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2023 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 7/24/2023. (je)
July 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Gina M Groh on 07/23/2023. (cwm) Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2023: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm).
June 9, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Add Signatures to Original Class Action Motion re #1 Complaint, by Andrew C Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope)(je)
June 8, 2023 Filing 3 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 6/5/2023 per USPS website. (je)
June 1, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 Court-Approved Form Bivens)(je)Copy to pro se Plaintiff by CMRR. (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/2/2023: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (je).
June 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Colette Peters, Director Bureau of Prisons in Her Official Capacity; Warden Lovett, Individual Capacity Hazelton Correctional Complex; All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex, filed by Andrew C Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Excerpt re: Special Mail, #2 Affidavit of Andrew Phillips, #3 Affidavit of Lacoste Steele, #4 Administrative Remedy for Macedo-Flores, #5 Statement by Christina Pilgrim, #6 USDC Notice of Deficient Pleading for case 5:23cv142, #7 Requests to Staff by Joan Cicchiello, #8 Certificate of Service, #9 Copy of Envelopes Received)(je)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phillips v. Peters et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew C Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colette Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Lovett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?