Cannon v. Dedoo

Cannon v. Dedoo

Petitioner:	Eugene C. Cannon
Respondent:	Kuma J. Dedoo
Case Number:	5:2008cv00069
Filed:	March 7, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Gilmer
Presiding Judge:	James E. Seibert
Presiding Judge:	Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2009	Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, DENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DECISION ON 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241, AND D ENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241: The Court finds that the 19 and 24 Reports and Recommendations of the magistrate judge are hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED in their entirety. Accordingly, respondent's 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Furthermore, petitioner's 1 § 2241 Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, this Court concludes that the petitioner's 22 Motion to Expedite and 23 Motion For Expedited Ruling are DENIED AS MOOT. It is ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 3/13/2009. (Copy to pro se petitioner (via certified mail/rrr), counsel) (kac)
January 26, 2009	Filing 24 CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT 1 PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241 BE DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that respondent's 7 Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. Accordingly, petitioner's 5 Motion for Expedited Ruling is DENIED as moot. Objections to R&R due within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of this R&R. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 1/26/2009. (Copy to Judge Stamp, pro se petitioner (via certified mail/rrr), counsel) (kac)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2009

Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, DENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DECISION ON 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241, AND D ENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241: The Court finds that the 19 and 24 Reports and Recommendations of the magistrate judge are hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED in their entirety. Accordingly, respondent's 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Furthermore, petitioner's 1 § 2241 Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, this Court concludes that the petitioner's 22 Motion to Expedite and 23 Motion For Expedited Ruling are DENIED AS MOOT. It is ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 3/13/2009. (Copy to pro se petitioner (via certified mail/rrr), counsel) (kac)

January 26, 2009

Filing 24 CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT 1 PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241 BE DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that respondent's 7 Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. Accordingly, petitioner's 5 Motion for Expedited Ruling is DENIED as moot. Objections to R&R due within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of this R&R. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 1/26/2009. (Copy to Judge Stamp, pro se petitioner (via certified mail/rrr), counsel) (kac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cannon v. Dedoo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Eugene C. Cannon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Kuma J. Dedoo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?