Hill v Deboo
William Hill |
Kuma J. DeBoo |
5:2008cv00146 |
September 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Gilmer |
David J. Joel |
Frederick P. Stamp |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Hill, be DENIED and DISMISSSED with Prejudice and 12 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kuma J. DeBoo be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Joel on 5/20/09. (c to Judge, c to pro se petitioner by cert mail)(cc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hill v Deboo | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: William Hill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Kuma J. DeBoo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.