Susko v. City Of Weirton et al
| Rosemary Susko |
| City Of Weirton, Mark Harris, William Miller, Rod Rosnick, Jim McHenry, Gary Dufour, John Yeager, Dewey Guida, Tom Virtue, Bob Arango and Bob Mrvos |
| 5:2009cv00001 |
| January 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Brooke |
| Frederick P Stamp |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
226
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER: Granting 182 Motion for Summary Judgment; and Granting 184 Motion for Summary Judgment. Motions terminated: 197 MOTION in Limine No. 1 regarding insurance and golden rule type arguments filed by Jim McHe nry, Et al; 204 MOTION in Limine No. 8 to prohibit presentation of evidence regarding the plaintiff's claim for punitive damages and alternatively motion to bifurcate punitive damages claim filed by Jim McHenry, et al; 193 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Rosemary Susko; 198 MOTION in Limine No. 2 regarding scope of rebuttal argument filed by Jim McHenry, Et al; 203 MOTION in Limine No. 7 to strike the plaintiff's expert witness(es) filed by Jim McHenry , Et al; 202 MOTION in Limine No. 6 to preclude reference to prior or subsequent lawsuits filed between the parties filed by Jim McHenry, Et al; 201 MOTION in Limine No. 5 to prohibit any party from requesting stipulations or to share e vidence in the presence of the jury filed by Jim McHenry, Et al; 199 MOTION in Limine No. 3 regarding intangible damages filed by Jim McHenry, Et al; 200 MOTION in Limine No. 4 to preclude reference to records and/or exhibits not previously produced filed by Jim McHenry, Et al. Clerk directed to enter Judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 1/20/11. (soa)
|
|
Filing
212
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Granting in part and denying in part 130 - Granting Motion to Compel and Denying Alternative Motion for Leave. Pltff. to respond fully to contested discovery within 14 days of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 1/12/11. (copy to Judge)(soa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
