Gallaher et al v. KBR, Inc. et al
| Dale Gallaher, Robert Wilson, Russell Powell, Andru Keller, Eric Heid, John Headley and Bradley Ebert |
| KBR, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc., Overseas Administration Services, Ltd. and Service Employees International, Inc. |
| 5:2009cv00069 |
| June 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Ohio |
| Frederick P Stamp |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: Granting 46 Motion to Dismiss; Denying as moot or in the alternative Granting 49 Motion to Vacate ; Granting 70 Motion for Leave to File; Denying as moot 74 Motion to Dismiss; Denying as moot 75 Motion to Stay; Denying as moot 76 Motion for entry of a Lone Pine Order; Denying as moot 82 Motion for Protective Order; and Granting 87 ***SEALED*** Motion. Case to be stricken from active docket of the Court; Clerk directed to enter judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 7/21/10. (soa) Modified on 7/21/2010 to regenerate NEF (soa).
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 39 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the amended complaint. The defendants may file any response to the amended complaint pursuant to the FRCP. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 2/8/2010. (kac) (Copy to counsel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
