Faulkner v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC et al
| Thomas Twain Faulkner |
| Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, NiSource Corporate Services Company and NiSource, Inc. |
| 5:2009cv00123 |
| November 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Marshall |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Granting in part and Denying in part 35 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting Plaintiff's 34 Alternative Request for Remand for Fur ther Consideration of the Evidence; and Denying as moot 39 Motion For Court to take Judicial Notice. Case is remanded to NiSource administrative committee for further consideration of the evidence on the specific issue (50-mile radius). Clerk directed to enter judgment pursuant to FRCP 58 in favor of defendant on all issues except the 50-mile radius issue. Case is Dismissed and Stricken from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 2/22/12. (soa)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER : Denying 25 Motion for Discovery and to Prohibit Reliance on Document of uncertain origin; parties to meet and submit proposed briefing schedule to the Court by 2/24/2011. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 2/10/11. (soa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
