Ebert v. Desco Corporation et al
| Joseph D. Ebert |
| Desco Corporation, Bellofram Corporation and Marsh Bellofram |
| 5:2010cv00046 |
| April 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Wetzel |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 40 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as MOOT 44 Motion in Limine; denying as MOOT 45 Motion in Limine; denying as MOOT 46 Motion in Limine; denying as MOOT 47 Motion in Limine. This civil action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this court. Clerk directed to enter Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 3/17/11. (cc)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss: the defendants' motion to dismiss defendants Bellofram Corporation, d/b/a Marsh Bellofram and Marsh Bellofram is Granted; to dismiss defendants Bellofram Corporation and Desco Corporation is Denied. Defendants Bellofram Corporation d/b/a Marsh Bellofram and Marsh Bellofram are dismissed and terminated from the case. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 9/20/10. (cc)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and denying Motion for attorney fees and costs. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 6/8/10. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
