Councell et al v. Homer Laughlin China Company
Plaintiff: Charles E. Councell and Carol L. Councell
Defendant: Homer Laughlin China Company
Case Number: 5:2011cv00045
Filed: March 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Wheeling Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 116 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER Overruling Plaintiffs' Objections to the Defendant's Bill of Costs and Awarding Defendant Costs As Sought: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), Local Rule of Civil Procedure 54.01,and Title 28, United States Code, Section 1920, the defendant is hereby awarded all costs requested in its bill of costs ECF No. 112 in the total amount of $4,957.60. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment order in this civil action which reflects this award. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 6/1/12. (rjs)
March 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 45 Motion to Amend; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 47 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint: GRANTING 47 Defendants' Motion to deny the plaintiffs' motion to amend; DENYING AS MOOT 47 Defendants' motion to enjoin and DENYING 47 Defendants' motion for sanctions. DENYING AS MOOT 49 Motion to Stay; GRANTING 57 defendants' motion for extension of page limit; The Defendants' mot ion for summary judgment and amended motion for summary judgment 59 and 62 are GRANTED. All remaining motions in limine : 64 Motion in Limine; 65 Motion in Limine, 66 Motion in Limine 67 Motion in Limine; 69 plaintiffs' motion to St rike defendant's motion in limine and 92 motion for leave to file additional motion in limine are DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs' 79 Motion for Disclosure of jury questionnaire and Rule 38 jury demand is DENIED AS MOOT. This case is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. Clerk directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 3/15/12. (cc)
October 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Denying Plas' 13 Motion to Remand, Granting In Part and Denying In Part Dft's 5 Motion to Dismiss, Granting Plas' 7 Motion For Leave To File An Amended Complaint by 10/21/11 And Denying 5 As Moot Dft's Motion to Strike. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/11/11. (mji)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Councell et al v. Homer Laughlin China Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles E. Councell
Represented By: Mark A. Kepple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol L. Councell
Represented By: Mark A. Kepple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Homer Laughlin China Company
Represented By: Erin J McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?