Panhandle Cleaning & Restoration, Inc. v. Vannest et al
| Panhandle Cleaning & Restoration, Inc. |
| Ronald W. Vannest, Charles W. Wyckoff and Shahn Golec |
| Ronald W. Vannest, Charles W. Wyckoff and Shahn Golec |
| Panhandle Cleaning & Restoration, Inc. |
| 5:2011cv00178 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Ohio |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, Court finds in favor of plaintiff Panhandle Cleaning & Restoration, Inc. and against defendant Shahn Golec in this injunctive proceedings. This civil action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active of this Court. Clerk directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/3/13. (cc)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION 35 FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT GOLEC, DENYING DEFENDANT GOLECS MOTION 33 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING DEFENDANTS VANNEST AND WYCKOFF. Defendants Charles W. Wyckoff and Ronald W. Vannest DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/5/12. (cc)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 5 Request for Entry of Default against Defendants Ronald W. Vannest, Charles W. Wyckoff, and Shan Golec and Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/18/12. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
