Harris v. Change, Inc.
Karen Harris |
Change, Inc. |
5:2012cv00118 |
July 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Wheeling Office |
Brooke |
John Preston Bailey |
James E. Seibert |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 ORDER GRANTING 57 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: The case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the matter dropped from the active docket of the Court. Accordingly, the plaintiffs pending Motion for Additional Mediation [Doc. 63], is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/9/2013. (kac) (Copy to pro se plaintiff (via cm/rrr)) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harris v. Change, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Karen Harris | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Change, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Thomas E. Buck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.