Braden v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.
| Frances Braden |
| Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. |
| Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. |
| Frances Braden |
| 5:2013cv00107 |
| August 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Ohio |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 53 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING 51 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. It is ORDERED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and STRICKEN from the active docket of th is Court. Accordingly, all pending motions are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Further, it is ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 11/21/2014. (copy to counsel of record via CM/ECF) (nmm)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Counsel for Defendant is directed to provide an unredacted electronic copy of all documents which were reviewed en camera to the Court Clerk for filing Under Seal For Court and Counsel For Defendant Eyes Only as part of the record of the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 10/14/2014. (copy to counsel of record via CM/ECF) (nmm)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 7 MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/9/2013. (kac)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
