O'Hara et al v. Capouillez et al
| Deirdre J. O'Hara and Michael C. O'Hara |
| Geological Assessment and Leasing and William Capouillez |
| 5:2013cv00119 |
| August 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Ohio |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND, DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO STAY PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION: Granting [6 ] Motion to Remand; Denying 9 Motion to Strike ; Denying Without Prejudice 18 Motion to Compel and 20 Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration; case remanded to Circuit Court of Ohio County and Dismissed and Stricken from active docket of this Court. Clerk directed to enter judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/14/14. (copy to Clerk, Circuit Court of Ohio Co, WV)(soa)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER CONFIRMING PRONOUNCED ORDER OF THE COURT GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL: Granting in part and Denying in part 22 Motion to Compel; Parties to confer and submit a proposed protective order by 12/24/13; written objections to this Order due within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 12/18/13. (soa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
