Riggle et al v. The Marshall County Coal Company et al
Plaintiff: Jennifer Kay Riggle and Brittni Ann Rice
Defendant: The Marshall County Coal Company, Trustees of the UMWA Retirement Fund and Blue Cross Blue Shield PPO Program, Murray American Energy, Inc. Plan 107
Case Number: 5:2015cv00169
Filed: December 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Wheeling Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 11 DEFENDANT THE MARSHALL COUNTY COAL COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DIRECTING THE PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A MOTION AS TO COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES. The plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The plaintiffs are hereby DIRECTED to file a formal motion for costs and reasonable attorney's fees by August 10, 2016. The defendants may file a response in opposition by August 24, 2016, and the plaintiffs may then file a reply in support by August 31, 2016. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 7/26/2016. (copy to counsel via CM/ECF) (nmm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riggle et al v. The Marshall County Coal Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Kay Riggle
Represented By: Patrick S. Cassidy
Represented By: Timothy F. Cogan
Represented By: Elgine H. McArdle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittni Ann Rice
Represented By: Patrick S. Cassidy
Represented By: Timothy F. Cogan
Represented By: Elgine H. McArdle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Marshall County Coal Company
Represented By: Joseph R. Blalock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trustees of the UMWA Retirement Fund
Represented By: David W. Allen
Represented By: Gary A. Collias
Represented By: Glenda S. Finch
Represented By: Jerry Mims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield PPO Program, Murray American Energy, Inc. Plan 107
Represented By: Jill E. Hall
Represented By: Ashley Hardesty Odell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?