Boggess v. Warren Distribution, Inc.
Plaintiff: Donald T. Boggess
Defendant: Warren Distribution, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2016cv00154
Filed: September 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Wheeling Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING WARREN DISTRIBUTION, INC.'S 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/24/16. (copy to counsel via CM/ECF) (lmm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boggess v. Warren Distribution, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald T. Boggess
Represented By: David L. Delk, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warren Distribution, Inc.
Represented By: James W. Harvey
Represented By: Kyle T. McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?