Amsler et al v. State of WV et al
| Guy Summers, Diana L. Summers, Daniel Claude Amsler, Elizabeth Lady Bird Jenkins, Sabrina L. Walker and Lisa Poling |
| Thomas G. Dyer, Governor J. Justice, Harrison County Prosecuters Office, Judge Moats, Barbour County Circuit Court, WV Dept. Humane Resources, WV Regional Jail Authority, Lewis County Family Court, County of Barbour, Judge James Matish, State of WV, Taylor County Circuit Court, Lewis Co. Prosecuters Office, County of Harrison and County of Lewis |
| 5:2018cv00113 |
| July 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Harrison |
| James E Seibert |
| Frederick P Stamp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Elizabeth Ladybird Jenkins, Daniel Claude Amsler, Sabrina L. Walker, Diana L. Summers, Guy Summers, Lisa Poling. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Daniel Amsler, #2 Affidavit of Elizabeth Jenkins, #3 Affidavit of Diana L. Summers, #4 Affidavit of Guy Summers, #5 Affidavit of Lisa Poling, #6 Affidavit of Sabrina Walker, #7 3/13/18 Order Appointing Counsel, #8 Financial Affidavit of Daniel Amsler, #9 Financial Affidavit of Diana L. Summers, #10 Financial Affidavit of Lisa Poling, #11 Envelope)(lmm) (Attachment 8 replaced on 7/11/2018 wrong document attached) (lmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
