Devine v. Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Petitioner: Richard Devine and Richard C. Devine
Respondent: Warden, FCI Huttonsville and Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Case Number: 5:2018cv00148
Filed: September 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: James P Mazzone
Referring Judge: Frederick P Stamp
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2018 Filing 17 RETURN RECEIPT as to #15 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Add and Terminate Attorneys. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/18/18. (soa)
October 22, 2018 Filing 16 LETTER from Richard Devine to Inmate Litigation Clerk regarding #12 Filing Fee Received and requesting copy of receipt. (copy of receipt sent via US Mail this day) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (copy to counsel via CM/ECF; copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND TERMINATE RESPONDENT'S REPRESENTATION BY ROBERT L. HOGAN: Granting #13 Motion Withdraw as attorney; Attorney Robert L. Hogan terminated. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/16/18. (soa) Modified on 10/16/2018 to note that copy was went to Petitioner by cet. mail) (soa). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2018: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa).
October 12, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary A. Viglianco on behalf of Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center (Viglianco, Zachary)
October 12, 2018 Filing 13 MOTION to Withdraw Appearance by Zachary A. Viglianco on behalf of Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center (Viglianco, Zachary) Modified on 10/12/2018 wrong event used by attorney, deputy clerk correct event type and regen NEF. (cmd).
October 9, 2018 Filing 12 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNE013130. (soa)
September 28, 2018 Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order on Public Motion. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/26/18. (soa)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS BUT REQUIRING THE PETITIONER TO PAY THE $5 FILING FEE: Granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/24/18. (soa)(copy to petitioner by cert. mail) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/24/2018: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa).
September 21, 2018 Filing 9 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Richard C. Devine. (Attachments: #1 Ledger Sheets, #2 Envelope containing #7 , #8 , & #9 )(soa)
September 21, 2018 Filing 8 ** SEALED** APPLICATION AND AFFIDAVIT To Proceed Without Prepayment of fees, re #4 Notice (Other), by Richard C. Devine. (soa)
September 21, 2018 Filing 7 COURT-APPROVED FORM (2254 Petition) re #4 Notice filed by Richard C. Devine. (soa) Modified on 9/21/2018 to describe document and regenerate NEF) (soa).
September 18, 2018 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Notice (Other), #3 Notice (Other). SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/12/18. (soa)
September 12, 2018 Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice (Other). SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/7/18. (soa)
September 10, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus mailed to Petitioner by cert. mail (Attachments: #1 2254 Packet)(soa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/10/2018: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa).
September 10, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus sent to Petitioner by cert. mail. (soa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/10/2018: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa).
September 5, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, sent to Petitioner by cert. mail. (Attachments: #1 2241 packet)(soa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/5/2018: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa).
September 4, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Warden, FCI Huttonsville, filed by Richard C. Devine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(soa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Devine v. Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Devine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard C. Devine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, FCI Huttonsville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Represented By: Zachary A. Viglianco
Represented By: Robert L. Hogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?