Woods et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
Lois Woods and Michael Woods |
Refresco Group, N.V., Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
5:2018cv00150 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Frederick P Stamp |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation, Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V. identifying Corporate Parent Refresco US Holding, Inc., Corporate Parent Refresco US Holding, Inc. for Cott Corporation.. (Nogay, Joseph) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation, Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V.. (Nogay, Joseph) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation, Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V.. (Nogay, Joseph) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Amanda W. Thai. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 10/26/2018. (copy to counsel via CM/ECF) (nmm) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Paul K. Leary, Jr. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 10/26/2018. (copy to counsel via CM/ECF) (nmm) |
Filing 8 PHV Filing fee for Paul Leary and Amanda Thai: $ 400.00, receipt number WVNW002016 (lmm) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Amanda W. Thai by Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation, Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V.. (Nogay, Joseph) Modified docket text re: atty. name on 10/26/2018 (nmm). |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Paul K. Leary, Jr. by Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation, Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V.. (Nogay, Joseph) Modified docket text re: atty. name on 10/26/2018 (nmm). |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint w/Affirmative Defenses by Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation, Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V..(Ennis, Peter) |
Filing 4 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND ANSWER DEADLINE: All Defendants to respond to Complaint by 10/17/18. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 9/17/18. (soa) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer Plaintiffs' Complaint by Cott Beverages, Inc., Cott Corporation, Refresco Beverages US, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ennis, Peter) |
Filing 2 FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 10/16/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/23/2018. Discovery due by 11/13/2018. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 9/12/18. (lmm) Modified on 9/12/2018 to REGEN NEF to Attorney Noel (lmm). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Circuit Court of Marshall County, (case number 18-C-156), filed by Cott Corporation, Cott Beverages, Inc., Refresco Group, N.V., Refresco Beverages US, Inc. Filing Fee $400 - Receipt #0424-2663467. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Stipulation of Consent, #4 Exhibit D - State Court file, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(lmm) Modified on 9/12/2018 to REGEN NEF to Attorney Noel (lmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.