Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
| Elizabeth Wright-Connor and Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company |
| LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. |
| 5:2018cv00192 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Frederick P Stamp |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28:1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. Defendant LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff. (Noel, Heather) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER. Joinder/Amendments due by 9/20/2019. Discovery due by 11/22/2019. Motions due by 12/6/2019. Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/5/2020. Pretrial Conference/Final Settlement Conference set for 2/10/2020 10:00 AM in Judge Stamp Chambers before Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp Jr. Jury Selection/Jury Trial set for 2/25/2020 08:30 AM in Wheeling District Judge Courtroom, South before Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp Jr. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 12/28/18. (lmm)
|
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Scheduling Order Checklist)(Noel, Heather) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.. (Noel, Heather) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc..(Noel, Heather) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 11/29/18. (lmm)
|
| Filing 8 PHV Filing fee for Rahul Gogineni: $ 200.00, receipt number WVNW002041 (lmm) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Rahul Gogineni, Esq. by Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company, Elizabeth Wright-Connor. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jecklin, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING. It is ORDERED that LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. will have until December 10, 2018 to answer. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr, on 11/29/18. (lmm)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION To Extend Time To Answer or Otherwise File a Responsive Pleading by LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.. (Noel, Heather) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather M. Noel on behalf of LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (Noel, Heather) |
|
Filing 3
FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 12/26/2018; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/2/2019; Initial Discovery Disclosures due by 1/23/2019. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 11/26/2018. (copy to counsel via CM/ECF and US Mail as needed) (nmm) Modified docket text on 11/26/2018 re: service copies (nmm).
|
| Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF ATTORNEY ADMISSION for Attorney Gogineni. (counsel via US Mail) (lmm) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Circuit Court of Marshall County, (case number 18-C-243), filed by LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. Filing Fee PAID $400 - Receipt #0424-2709329. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Secretary of State, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
