Bezilla v. Tug Hill Operating, LLC
| Daniel Bezilla |
| Tug Hill Operating, LLC |
| 5:2018cv00198 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #4 TUG HILL OPERATING, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT: Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend his Complaint; any amended complaint shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. The #6 Consent Motion to Stay Initial Discovery and Scheduling is hereby GRANTED. The deadlines set by the Court's December 6, 2018, #2 Order are hereby VACATED. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/22/2019. (copy to counsel via CM/ECF) (nmm)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION to Stay re #2 FirstOrder,, Initial Discovery and Scheduling by Tug Hill Operating, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ryan, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support by Tug Hill Operating, LLC re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Weiss, Emily) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Tug Hill Operating, LLC. (Weiss, Emily) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tug Hill Operating, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Tug Hill, Inc. for Tug Hill Operating, LLC.. (Weiss, Emily) (Main Document 3 replaced on 12/11/2018) (soa). Modified on 12/11/2018 to attach non-fillable PDF(soa). |
|
Filing 2
VACATED pursuant to #7 Order. ORDER -- FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 1/7/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/21/2019. Initial Discovery Disclosures due by 2/7/2019. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/6/18. (soa) Modified docket text on 1/22/2019 to show Order is Vacated (nmm).
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Wetzel County County Circuit Court, (case number 18-C-72), filed by Tug Hill Operating, LLC.Filing Fee Paid - Receipt #0424-2716509 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bezilla v. Tug Hill Operating, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Bezilla | |
| Represented By: | Richard Kyle Nuttall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tug Hill Operating, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Thomas C. Ryan |
| Represented By: | Emily C. Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
