Patterson v. Westfield Insurance Company
| Charles Howard Patterson |
| Westfield Insurance Company |
| 5:2019cv00017 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder & Amendments due by 5/31/2019; Discovery due by 12/2/2019; Motions due by 1/17/2020; Responses due by 2/7/2020; Replies due by 2/17/2020; Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/23/2020; Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/6/2020 02:00 PM in Wheeling, WV; Jury Selection/Jury Trial set for 4/21/2020 08:30 AM in Wheeling, WV. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 3/29/2019. (copy to counsel via CM/ECF) (nmm)
|
| Filing 6 RULE 26(f) REPORT WITH WORKSHEET Other Document filed by Westfield Insurance Company. (Kesner, Brent) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Westfield Insurance Company.(Kesner, Brent) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Westfield Insurance Company identifying corporate parent Ohio Farmers Insurance Company. (Kesner, Brent) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/20/2019 to attach non-fillable pdf document) (nmm). Modified docket text on 2/20/2019 re: corporate parent (nmm). |
|
Filing 3
FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 3/19/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/2/2019. Discovery due by 4/19/2019. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 2/19/19. (lmm)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Charles Howard Patterson NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION (Cross, Erica) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia, (case number 19-C-11), filed by Westfield Insurance Company. Filing Fee $400 - Receipt #0424-2759582. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - copy of Docket Sheet and copies of paper file from State Court, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (copy to counsel via CM/ECF) (nmm) Modified docket text on 2/15/2019 to include filing fee; NEF Regenerated (nmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patterson v. Westfield Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Howard Patterson | |
| Represented By: | Erica A. Cross |
| Represented By: | James G. Bordas, III |
| Represented By: | Erica A. Conti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Westfield Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Tanya M. Kesner |
| Represented By: | Brent K. Kesner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
