Bowman v. Marshall County Prosecutor's Office
Michael Daniel Bowman |
Marshall County Prosecutor's Office |
5:2019cv00249 |
August 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
James P Mazzone |
Frederick P Stamp |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTIFICATION. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/2/2019. (nmm) |
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTIFICATION. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 9/30/19. (Pro Se Plaintiff via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Additional Pages by Michael Daniel Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope) (copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm) |
Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/26/2019. (nmm) |
Filing 7 LETTER from Michael D. Bowman to Clerk regarding proceeding as Pro Se litigant. ( #6 Notice w/ Court Approved form packet sent this same day) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 1983 Court Approved forms packet) (copy to Pro Se Plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2019: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 5 Envelope received re: #1 #2 #3 #4 , filed by Michael Daniel Bowman. (copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm) |
Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Daniel Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Ledger Sheets) (copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm) |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Michael Daniel Bowman. (copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Daniel Bowman. (copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marshall County Prosecutor's Office, filed by Michael Daniel Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - May 19, 2017 Transcript of bench conference, #2 Exhibit 2 - Signature comparison sheet with Defendant Joseph R. Canestraro's signatures amidst the forgeries on the indictments; indictments also included, #3 Exhibit 3 - Court documents appointing John M. Jurco on March 7 2019, #4 Exhibit 4 - October 19, 2018 letter from appellate attorney showing when case file was received, #5 Exhibit 5 - March 26, 2019 letter from Defendant, Ms. Wade, in which she falsifies court documents, #6 Exhibit 6 - Lawyer Disciplinary Complaints filed against Defendants Joseph R. Canestraro and Rhonda Wade) (nmm) (copy to Judge Stamp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bowman v. Marshall County Prosecutor's Office | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Marshall County Prosecutor's Office | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Daniel Bowman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.