Taylor v. Hudgins
| Matthew Taylor |
| R. Hudgins |
| 5:2019cv00291 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RETURN RECEIPT as to #9 Clerk's Judgment, #8 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 12/4/19. (soa) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of R. Hudgins against Matthew Taylor Signed by Cheryl Dean Riley, Clerk, on 12/2/19. (soa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/2/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa). |
Filing 8
ORDER Adopting #6 Report and Recommendation; Denying #1 Petition and Dismissing same without Prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; Denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and Striking case from active docket of this Court. Clerk directed to enter judgment. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/2/19. (copy to Petitioner by cert.mail)(soa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/2/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa).
|
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Matthew Taylor. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/7/19. (soa) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Matthew Taylor: Recommending Denial and Dismissal Without Prejudice for Lack of Jurisdiction of #1 Petition; written objections due within 14 days of receipt of this R/R. M/J association is terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 11/5/19. (soa)(copy to Petitioner by cert. mail) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/6/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (soa). |
| Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone no longer assigned to case. (soa) |
| Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Notice (Other). SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/18/19. (soa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (copy to Pro Se Petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Matthew Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Ledger Sheets, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against R. Hudgins, filed by Matthew Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Hudgins | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Matthew Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: R. Hudgins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
