Tysk v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff: Joseph L. Tysk
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Case Number: 5:2019cv00295
Filed: October 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: Frederick P Stamp
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings/ due by 3/13/2020. Discovery due by 8/28/2020. Motions due by 9/25/2020. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 11/2/2020. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/16/2020 03:00 PM in Wheeling District Judge Courtroom, North before District Judge John Preston Bailey. Jury Selection/Jury Trial set for 12/1/2020 09:00 AM in Wheeling District Judge Courtroom, North before District Judge John Preston Bailey. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/4/19. (soa)
December 3, 2019 Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Adkins, J.)
October 24, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC.(Adkins, J.)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER -- FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 11/19/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/3/2019. Initial Discovery Disclosures due by 12/17/2019. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/22/19. (soa)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION: Case reassigned to District Judge John Preston Bailey for all further proceedings. Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr no longer assigned to case. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/21/19. (soa)
October 17, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC identifying Corporate Parent ERC Holdings, LLC for Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (copy to counsel via cm/ecf; copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm)
October 17, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia, (case number 19-C-225), filed by Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. Filing Fee $400 - Receipt #0424-2922399. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copy of State Court filings, etc., #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (copy to counsel via cm/ecf; copy to Judge Stamp) (nmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tysk v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph L. Tysk
Represented By: Thomas E. McIntire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Represented By: J. Mark Adkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?