Rogers v. Capehart et al
H. John Rogers |
Royce Capehart and Timothy Haught |
5:2020cv00007 |
January 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court on 3/9/2020. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to counsel via cm/ecf) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/9/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: plaintiffs Complaint [1-1] should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Defendants #3 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and to STRIKE this action from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 3/9/2020. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to counsel via cm/ecf) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/9/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 9 Mail sent to H. John Rogers #5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT Returned as Undeliverable: Return to Sender; Unclaimed; Unable to Forward. (nmm) |
Filing 8 Mail sent to H. John Rogers #2 FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING, Returned as Undeliverable: Return to Sender; Unclaimed; Unable to Forward. (nmm) |
Filing 7 Mail sent to H. John Rogers #6 ROSEBORO NOTICE, Returned as Undeliverable: Return to Sender; Temporarily Away; Unable to Forward. (nmm) |
Filing 6 ROSEBORO NOTICE re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Royce Capehart: Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the pro se party shall file any opposition to the motion. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/21/2020. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to counsel via cm/ecf) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/21/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to counsel via cm/ecf) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/16/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM Of Law In Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Royce Capehart re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint . (Bird, Melissa) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Royce Capehart. (Bird, Melissa) |
Filing 2 FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 2/17/2020; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/2/2020; Discovery due by 3/17/2020. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/15/2020. (copy to pro se plaintiff via cm,rrr; copy to counsel via cm/ecf) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Magistrate Court of Wetzel County, West Virginia, (case number 19-M52C-00120), filed by Royce Capehart. Filing Fee $400 - Receipt #0424-2969126. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - copies of process documents served upon Mr. Capehart from State Court Action, #2 Exhibit B - copy of State Court docket sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (copy to counsel via cm/ecf) (nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.