Barnett v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Plaintiff: Keith Antonio Barnett
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons and Robert Hudgins
Case Number: 5:2020cv00131
Filed: July 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ESTABLISHING ANSWER DATE: granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Federal Bureau of Prisons answer due 9/30/2020; Robert Hudgins answer due 9/30/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 8/28/2020. (ag)(copy pro se Plaintiff CM/rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/28/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag).
August 27, 2020 Filing 6 Proposed Order (refiled to correct inconsistency in date on original proposed order) re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Federal Bureau of Prisons, Robert Hudgins. (Tighe, Tara)
August 27, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Federal Bureau of Prisons, Robert Hudgins. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tighe, Tara)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ESTABLISHING ANSWER DATE. Motion #3 for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complain is GRANTED. Federal Bureau of Prisons answer due 8/31/2020; Robert Hudgins answer due 8/31/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 7/2/2020. (copy to pro se Plaintiff via CM/rrr)(ag) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag).
July 1, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Federal Bureau of Prisons, Robert Hudgins. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tighe, Tara)
July 1, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (copy to pro se Plaintiff via CM/rrr) (ag) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag).
July 1, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Circuit Court of Gilmer County, WV, (case number CC-11-2020-C-13) filed by Federal Bureau of Prisons and Robert Hudgins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnett v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Represented By: Christopher James Prezioso
Represented By: Tara Noel Tighe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Hudgins
Represented By: Christopher James Prezioso
Represented By: Tara Noel Tighe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Antonio Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?