Boswell v. USA
Petitioner: Dawantaye Boswell
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 5:2020cv00149
Filed: July 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2020 Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #7 Order #8 Clerk's Judgment. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/14/20. (lmm)
September 9, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court on 9/9/20. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This Court ORDERS that petitioner's #1 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Custody be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the respondent and to STRIKE the civil case from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 9/9/20. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
August 25, 2020 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Dawantaye Boswell. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/18/20. (lmm)
August 13, 2020 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The undersigned recommends that Petitioner's #1 #4 Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate the Magistrate Judges association with this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 8/13/20. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/13/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm).
August 10, 2020 Filing 4 COURT-APPROVED FORM re #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Dawantaye Boswell. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (copy to Petitioner via US Mail)
August 7, 2020 Filing 3 RETURN RECEIPT as to 2 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 7/31/20 per USPS. (lmm)
July 27, 2020 Filing 2 PAPERLESS NOTICE re #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Civil Case opened for statistical purposes only. ALL FUTURE DOCKETING TO BE DONE IN 5:09-cr-38. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm)
July 27, 2020 Filing 1 PRO MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Dawantaye Boswell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boswell v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: David J. Perri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dawantaye Boswell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?