Thompson v. United States of America
Griffin A. Thompson |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
5:2020cv00203 |
September 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Griffin A. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ag)(address updated) |
Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Griffin A. Thompson. Per USPS SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/5/2020. (ag) |
Filing 8 REPLY in Support of Motion/2241 for Habeas Relief re #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Griffin A. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Judge's Copy, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(ag) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Griffin A. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: it is RECOMMENDED that #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Griffin A. Thompson be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Written objections shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this Report and Recommendation. Failure to file written objections shall constitute a waiver of de novo review by the District Court and a waiver of appellate review by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/1/2020. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/23/2020 (per usps website). (nmm) |
Filing 4 Paperless Notice: Filing fee of $5.00 paid in case 1:20v218 to be applied to new case 5:20cv203 pursuant to Order Dismissing Case Following Notice of Intent to Dismiss entered on 9/22/2020 in case 1:20cv218. Copy mailed to pro se petitioner. (wrr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/21/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
Filing 1 Pro Se PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Seeking Relief Under First Step Act of 2018, filed by Griffin A. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Receipt in 1:20-cv-218 re: filing fee, #2 Envelope)(copy to usp via email) (nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thompson v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | William J. Powell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Griffin A. Thompson | |
Represented By: | Brian J. Kornbrath |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.