Banks v. Antonelli et al
| Frederick Banks |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Intelligence Agency and Antonelli |
| 5:2020cv00213 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION To Reopen Case by Frederick Banks. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmm) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Frederick Banks (Attachments: #1 Envelope)docket updated(jmm) |
| Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/21/2020 (per usps website). (nmm) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/19/2020. (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/19/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm).
|
| Filing 3 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice of Deficient Pleading. Per USPS SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/5/2020. (ag) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 2241 Packet) (copy to pro se petitioner via cm,rrr) (nmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2020: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (nmm). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Antonelli, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Prisons, filed by Frederick Banks. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
