In Re: David Pulver Pray, Debtor
| Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of David Pulver Pray |
| U.S. Trustee |
| David Pray Pulver and David Pulver Pray |
| 5:2020cv00217 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING #1 MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE this matter from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/28/20. (lmm)
|
| Filing 3 REPLY TO #2 MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE AND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE. (nmm) |
| Filing 2 TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. (Attachments: #1 Bankruptcy Docket Sheet, #2 Motion for Withdrawal, #3 Notice of Motion for Withdrawal of Reference, #4 BNC Certificate of Service of Notice of Motion, #5 Order of Assignment of Case to the Honorable Paul M. Black, #6 BNC Certificate of Service of Order of Assignment, #7 Response in Opposition to Motion for Withdrawal of Reference w/exhibits)(kac) |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE In Re: David Pulver Pray , Debtor, filed by Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of David Pulver Pray.(kac) Modified docket text to correct party name on 10/21/2020 (nmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
