Harness v. Adams
Lonnie Harness |
Paul Adams |
5:2020cv00232 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #9 Order #10 Clerk's Judgment. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/19/20. (lmm) |
Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/18/20. (lmm) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 11/17/20. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petitioner's #8 objections are OVERRULED. This Court further ORDERS that petitioner's #1 petition be DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the respondent and to STRIKE this case from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 11/17/20. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 8 WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/2/20. (lmm) |
Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 Notice #2 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/28/20 per USPS. (lmm) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The undersigned recommends that the #1 petition be DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to terminate the Magistrate Judges association with this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/28/20. (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone no longer assigned to case pursuant to #5 Report and Recommendation. (lmm) |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNC003038. (lmm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Attach. B & C of 2241 Form) (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2020: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2020: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Paul Adams, filed by Lonnie Harness. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harness v. Adams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Lonnie Harness | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Paul Adams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.