Ables v. WVDOCR et al
| David Glen Ables |
| WVDOCR and Betsy C. Jividen |
| 5:2020cv00245 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FILED IN WRONG CASE(ag). |
| Filing 7 LETTER from David Ables to Clerk of Court requesting status of case.(public docket sheet sent this same day) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmm) |
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 11/20/2020. (nmm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE. (ag)(pro se Plaintiff CM rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag). |
| Filing 4 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Glen Ables. (Attachments: #1 Appendix B - Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus Form, #2 Envelope)(ag) |
| Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by David Glen Ables. (Attachments: #1 Ledger Sheets, #2 Envelope)(ag) |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by David Glen Ables. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ag) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Betsy C. Jividen, WVDOCR filed by David Glen Ables. (Attachments: #1 Grievances and Responses, #2 Envelope)(ag) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
