Francis v. United States of America
Elwin Junior Francis |
United States of America |
5:2021cv00085 |
June 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Mail sent to Elwin Junior Francis re #5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT and #6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING, Returned as Undeliverable; Return to Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward. (nmm) |
Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE and #8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 6/11/2021. (nmm) |
Filing 10 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT and #6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 6/8/2021. (nmm) |
Filing 9 Photocopy of existing Complaint, IFP, Consent to Collection of Fees, and Prisoner Trust Fund Account filed by Elwin Junior Francis. (Attachments: #1 Application and Affidavit IFP, #2 Consent to Collection of Fees, #3 Prisoner Trust Account Report, #4 Notice of Change of Address (Blank), #5 Envelope)(ag) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Elwin Junior Francis. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 6/7/2021. (ag)(pro se PLA CM rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/7/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the filing fee waived. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 6/7/2021. (ag)(pro se PLA CM rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/7/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Pro Se Plaintiff via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/4/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (Pro Se Plaintiff via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/4/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Elwin Junior Francis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Elwin Junior Francis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elwin Junior Francis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America, filed by Elwin Junior Francis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Francis v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Elwin Junior Francis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.