Mollohan v. State of West Virginia et al
Jeffery Earnest Mollohan |
State of West Virginia, Salem Correctional Center and Braxton County |
5:2021cv00153 |
August 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/2/2021. (nmm) |
Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/2/2021. (nmm) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE: granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 8/31/2021. (ag)(pro se PET cm rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2021: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE. (ag)(pro se PET cm rrr) |
Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jeffery Earnest Mollohan. (Attachments: #1 Ledger Sheets, #2 Envelope)(ag) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffery Earnest Mollohan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ag) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Braxton County, Salem Correctional Center, State of West Virginia, filed by Jeffery Earnest Mollohan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ag) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.