Abernathy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Michele D Abernathy |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
5:2022cv00037 |
March 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Michael John Aloi |
John Preston Bailey |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Attorney General of the United States, served on 3/30/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Social Security Administration, served on 3/22/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney served on 3/21/2022. (ag) |
Filing 6 ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING #2 PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND AFFIDAVIT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 3/3/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Dana W. Duncan. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 3/3/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 4 PHV Filing fee for Dana W. Duncan: $ 200.00, receipt number WVNW002921 (lmm) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Dana W. Duncan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(nmm) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michele D Abernathy. (nmm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Michele D Abernathy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(nmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.